Shared Leadership: The Debate and Its Impact on Team Processes

The shared leadership concept has sparked considerable debate in the evolving leadership landscape.

Some question whether it genuinely impacts team dynamics or if it's just another passing trend in management theory. 

Yet, numerous studies suggest that shared leadership isn’t just a buzzword—it’s a significant predictor of effective team processes.

But what does this mean for teams’ day-to-day functioning and overall success?

What is Shared Leadership?

Shared leadership, or participative or democratic leadership, involves distributing leadership roles and decision-making responsibilities across a team rather than centralizing authority in a single leader.

This approach encourages team members to take initiative, contribute ideas, and engage in collaborative problem-solving.

The core idea is that leadership is not confined to a single person but is a collective process that involves all team members.

Imagine a football team where each player takes turns strategizing and leading plays instead of one captain calling all the shots.

This collaborative approach can leverage each player’s strengths, fostering a more dynamic and adaptive team.

A photo of people doing handshakes together win shared leadership
Photo by fauxels

The Debate: Is Shared Leadership Effective?

The debate surrounding shared leadership1 often revolves around its effectiveness and practicality.

Critics argue that shared leadership can lead to confusion, lack of direction, and inefficiency, especially if team members have conflicting visions or lack clear communication.

However, proponents point to a growing body of research indicating that shared leadership can enhance team performance, creativity, and satisfaction.

They argue that when team members are empowered and trusted, they are more likely to engage deeply with their work and contribute innovative solutions.

The Evidence: What Studies Reveal

Several studies have investigated the impact of shared leadership on various team processes. Here’s a closer look at some of the key findings:

  1. Enhanced Team Performance

Research has consistently shown that shared leadership can improve team performance.

A study published in the Journal of Applied2 Psychology found that teams with shared leadership structures performed better on complex tasks than teams led by a single leader.

The study attributed this improvement to multiple team members’ diverse perspectives and expertise, facilitating more effective problem-solving and decision-making.

  • Increased Team Satisfaction and Engagement

Shared leadership has been linked to higher levels of team satisfaction and engagement. According to a study in The Leadership Quar3terly, teams with shared leadership reported greater job satisfaction and a stronger sense of cohesion.

This is likely because shared leadership fosters a more inclusive and supportive team environment where members feel valued and empowered.

  • Improved Creativity and Innovation

The impact of shared leadership on creativity is particularly notable.

A research paper in Organization Science demonstrated that teams practising shared leadership generated more creative solutions and innovative ideas than those with traditional leadership structures.

The study found that when leadership responsibilities are distributed, team members are more willing to take risks and experiment with new approaches.

  • Better Conflict Resolution

Conflict resolution is another area where shared leadership shows promise.

A Group & Organization Management study found that teams with shared leadership were better equipped to manage and resolve conflicts effectively.

This is because shared leadership encourages open communication and collective problem-solving, which helps address issues before they escalate.

Critical Factors for Successful Shared Leadership

While shared leadership offers many potential benefits, its success depends on several factors. Here are some critical considerations for implementing shared leadership effectively:

  1. Clear Communication

For shared leadership to work, communication must be clear and compelling.

Team members must understand their roles and responsibilities and how decisions are made.

Regular meetings and open dialogue can help ensure everyone is on the same page and that any issues are addressed promptly.

  • Trust and Respect

Trust and respect among team members are crucial for shared leadership to thrive.

When team members trust and respect each other’s contributions, they are more likely to collaborate effectively and support one another. Building a culture of trust requires consistent effort and commitment from all team members.

  • Defined Roles and Responsibilities

Even in a shared leadership model, it’s important to have defined roles and responsibilities.

While leadership is distributed, each team member should clearly understand their duties and how they contribute to the overall team goals. This helps prevent confusion and ensures everyone works towards the same objectives.

  • Training and Development

Training and development can play a significant role in the success of shared leadership.

Giving team members the skills and knowledge to take on leadership roles can enhance their effectiveness and confidence.

Leadership training programs can also help team members develop the interpersonal and communication skills necessary for successful collaboration.

Real-World Examples

Several organizations have successfully implemented shared leadership models, demonstrating the practical benefits of this approach. Here are a few examples:

  1. Google

Google is known for its innovative and collaborative culture, which is reflected in its leadership approach.

The company encourages employees to take initiative and contribute ideas, fostering a shared leadership environment. Google’s success in driving innovation and creativity is partly attributed to its commitment to shared leadership.

  • W. L. Gore & Associates

W. L. Gore & Associates, the company behind Gore-Tex, is another example of successful shared leadership.

The company operates with a lattice structure, where employees are encouraged to take on leadership roles and contribute to decision-making. This approach has helped Gore achieve high levels of employee engagement and innovation.

  • Southwest Airlines

Southwest Airlines is known for its strong team culture and emphasis on shared leadership.

The company empowers employees to make decisions and contribute to the organization’s success. This approach has helped Southwest maintain high customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.

Key Takeaways

  • Shared Leadership Enhances Team Performance: Research shows that shared leadership can improve team members’ performance, creativity, and satisfaction.
  • Effective Communication and Trust are Crucial: Clear communication and mutual trust are essential for shared leadership to be successful.
  • Training and Defined Roles Support Success: Providing team members with the necessary skills and defining roles can help ensure the effectiveness of shared leadership.
  • Real-World Examples Demonstrate Its Benefits: Companies like Google, W. L. Gore & Associates, and Southwest Airlines have successfully implemented shared leadership models, showcasing their practical advantages.

Conclusion

The debate over shared leadership continues, but the evidence suggests that this approach can significantly impact team processes.

By distributing leadership responsibilities and fostering a collaborative environment, teams can enhance their performance, creativity, and overall satisfaction. While shared leadership may not be a one-size-fits-all solution, it offers valuable insights into how leadership can be more inclusive and effective.

As organizations navigate the complexities of modern work environments, exploring and implementing shared leadership models may lead to more dynamic and successful teams.

The key is to balance empowerment with clear communication and support, ensuring all team members can contribute to their fullest potential.

Notes

  1. https://howlround.com/risk-shared-leadership
    ↩︎
  2. https://link.springer.com/journal/426?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjw9Km3BhDjARIsAGUb4nwnkOvPqN0iAjnaW4SfKA3BV7v8xDJcWQBgcbjCs6N8Fxjnxy8lwKUaAsddEALw_wcB ↩︎
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-leadership-quarterly ↩︎